lctang

E350 算吧

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-20 22:41 發表

The Cinebench one

I see, but still in most apps D2700 is leading to some extent.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-20 22:49 發表

I see, but still in most apps D2700 is leading to some extent.

Same architecture, a little bit freq increase can overcome 30%+ single thread performance?

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-20 22:52 發表

Same architecture, a little bit freq increase can overcome 30%+ single thread performance?

Despite this fact, reviews are not quite consistent.
Maybe more reviews have to be concerned.

ccw

Besides, does the lan controller matter?
Will an Intel controller make a difference, or better to say, will a dual lan realtek based board turn out to be the bottleneck itself?

Another question, the bandwidth of PCI-E 2.0 x1 looks not enough for 1GB Lan card, is it the story?
Thanks in advance.

PS: If D525 is good enough, I will save 300 from getting E-350.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 00:41 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 00:33 發表
Besides, does the lan controller matter?
Will an Intel controller make a difference, or better to say, will a dual lan realtek based board turn out to be the bottleneck itself?

Another question, the  ...

not much

all lan controller can do 900Mbps

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-21 01:10 發表

not much

all lan controller can do 900Mbps

As viewing from Newegg, someone said that when their server CPU is high(~90%), the throughtput speed dropped from 75MB/s to 20MB/s using onboard,
but a drop of 75MB/s to 70MB/s is observed after using Intel 1000 CT.

Another point is that, on my notebook which is using a Broadcom Lan controller and Intel T6500,
the CPU utilization goes up to 40%(constantly) when transferring files between notebook and server.
Is this case different from what a router works? Or the high utilization is actually due to storage's I/O, and router won't suffer from the same?

jackli

其實你想用點用?
24hours 都系 1000Mbps wan<->lan??
定系好多時間都系 lan<->lan?

你想知到cpu 的影響, 可以download你隻routeros 落usb thumb, usb boot 試
用部四核試一次, 用部atom 又試一次, lan 卡用返同一張
然後用果個j唔知咩咩java speed tester 測下你就知..
根本最大bottleneck 系storage device...

lctang

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-21 11:04 發表
其實你想用點用?
24hours 都系 1000Mbps wanlan??
定系好多時間都系 lanlan?

你想知到cpu 的影響, 可以download你隻routeros 落usb thumb, usb boot 試
用部四核試一次, 用部atom 又試一次, lan 卡用返同一張
然後 ...

Lan <> Lan 我最快都係 60M 左右
平均45

qcmadness

realtek driver: linux is better

YCST

Storage devices are the main bottleneck. I tried to use FTP to transfer large file between two onboard realtek NIC machines in my home network, transfer rate is about 70-90MB/s.  When I use network testing tool, transfer rate is increased to 110-117MB/s.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-21 11:04 發表
其實你想用點用?
24hours 都系 1000Mbps wanlan??
定系好多時間都系 lanlan?

你想知到cpu 的影響, 可以download你隻routeros 落usb thumb, usb boot 試
用部四核試一次, 用部atom 又試一次, lan 卡用返同一張
然後 ...

24x7 1000Mbit/s NAT and extremely stable as a router;
For BT(main throughput), FTP, VPN+MS RDP, Web Host<-- all these are done by server.
, so I need to know the capability for margin.

Per your experience, it looks unsuitable for me to refer to file transfer speed and CPU utilization.
Still getting more information for the NAT,
btw, any channel for Cr@cked RouterOS, or license must be bought?

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 13:50 編輯 ]

ccw

Another stupid question,
I found a card form Intel, Intel 1000 GT, which is a Giga Lan card on PCI,
would PCI's bandwidth enough to run it for 1000Mbps?

And do you know if Intel WiFi Link 6300  a good option for WiFi?

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 13:31 編輯 ]

jackli

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 13:17 發表

24x7 1000Mbit/s NAT and extremely stable as a router, for BT(main throughput), FTP, VPN+MS RDP, Web Host

nat + firewall 絕對 唔應該 同 php, mysql, ftp 等server 同一部機,
當你一路比十幾個人fetching php+mysql, 又比幾條友 幾十MB/s download,
仲要做埋nat + firewall, 唔好計 qos 添, atom 緊系唔夠力la,

我以為你淨系做nat + 少量bt + 幾丁友上網 <~ 咁就一個atom 可以食盡125MB/s
除左Mbps外, I/O number 都好緊要嫁..
唔系咩野做到DDOS~ 大量食哂你D I/O

[ 本帖最後由 jackli 於 2011-11-21 13:44 編輯 ]

jackli

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-21 13:29 發表
Another stupid question,
I found a card form Intel, Intel 1000 GT, which is a Giga Lan card on PCI,
would PCI's bandwidth enough to run it for 1000Mbps?

And do you know if Intel WiFi Link 6300  a goo ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conventional_PCI