lctang

用緊呢隻 switch
http://www.planex.com.tw/product/soho/switch/fxg-08ep.htm

ccw

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-11-22 00:29 發表
用緊呢隻 switch
http://www.planex.com.tw/product/soho/switch/fxg-08ep.htm

Looks good
http://www.planex.com.tw/product/soho/switch/fxg-05ep.htm
And this should suffice my need, available in SSP?

While I may also run the current WZR as switch to see if that is ok before getting a new one

lctang

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 00:42 發表

Looks good
http://www.planex.com.tw/product/soho/switch/fxg-05ep.htm
And this should suffice my need, available in SSP?

While I may also run the current WZR as switch to see if that is ok  ...

8port 貴DDDDD

lctang

pc1, pc2, AV amp, Fon ap, E4200 >> switch >> giga >> PC router
not pc1, pc2, AV amp, Fon ap, >> E4200 or switch >> giga >> PC router

ccw

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-11-22 00:53 發表
pc1, pc2, AV amp, Fon ap, E4200 >> switch >> giga >> PC router
not pc1, pc2, AV amp, Fon ap, >> E4200 or switch >> giga >> PC router

So complicated

My case will be
iPad, Brother's computer, Any phone >> :0) Router
:0) Router + Server + My notebook >> Switch >> Proposed PC Router >> BB1000

Giga = Cat6?

lctang

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 01:10 發表

So complicated

My case will be
iPad, Brother's computer, Any phone >> :0) Router
:0) Router + Server + My notebook >> Switch >> Proposed PC Router >> BB1000
Giga = Cat6?

最好cat6 短短地5E 都OK既
cat6 好硬

should be

any pc / device (wired) \
                                      +switch >> Proposed PC Router >> BB1000
any wifi >> ap(router)  /


dont use ap(router) as switch

ccw

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-11-22 01:23 發表


最好cat6 短短地5E 都OK既
cat6 好硬

should be

any pc / device (wired) \
                                      +switch >> Proposed PC Router >> BB1000
any wifi >> ap(router)  /


dont use ap(r ...

Using 10M Cat6
Now
Notebook >> 10M Cat6 >> :0) Router >> 10M Cat6 >> Server,
Throughput > 110MB/s
One of them is flat cable, very soft

For dedicated switch, I do prefer getting one where possible.

jackli

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-11-22 00:10 發表
Q9450>> Marvell 8056 >> giga >> switch >> giga >>淘寶貨 intel 1000MT @pci 32bit - pc outer >> giga >> modem

firewall 問題...

咩野firewall 搞成咁

ccw

Suddenly find that G440 can be a choice:
http://hi.baidu.com/tyc6982/blog ... 84cf4b4ec226eb.html

Any idea?
Foxconn H61 =$400
G440 = $319, looks a possible choice over Atom and E-350.
Does router consider Single Threaded performance or Multi Threaded?

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 13:34 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 13:33 發表
Suddenly find that G440 can be a choice:
http://hi.baidu.com/tyc6982/blog ... 84cf4b4ec226eb.html

Any idea?
Foxconn H61 =$400
G440 = $319, looks a possible choice over Atom and E-350.
Does ...

G440 is a different league of performance and power consumption

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-22 18:59 發表

G440 is a different league of performance and power consumption

I understand, and I concern even more in heat dissipation;
Atom needs no active cooling.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 19:23 發表

I understand, and I concern even more in heat dissipation;
Atom needs no active cooling.

咁你只可以揀atom / e-xxx

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-22 19:51 發表

咁你只可以揀atom / e-xxx

The problem is Atom's availability is too low and new CPU has yet to hit the market,
E-350 is possible, but a bit too expensive;
on the same level G440 system is more attractive, in which H61+G440 =~$72x.
And what do you think about the below graphs?





G440 doesn't consume much more.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 21:10 編輯 ]

qcmadness

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... 0-g440_7.html#sect0

引用:

Mainboards:

    ASUS Crosshair IV Formula (Socket AM3, AMD 890FX + SB850, DDR3 SDRAM);
    ASUS P5Q3 (LGA775, Intel P45 Express, DDR3 SDRAM);
    ASUS P8H61-I (LGA1155, Intel H61 Express);
    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (LGA1155, Intel P67 Express);
    Gigabyte GA-D525TUD (Intel Atom D525, Intel NM10 Express);
    Gigabyte GA-E350N-USB3 (AMD E-350, AMD Hudson M1).

from previous article:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... 2100t_11.html#sect0

引用:

However, the graph above is not entirely straight-forward. The thing is that we used Gigabyte E350N-USB3 mainboard to measure the performance of Brazos platform in our today’s test session. And this mainboard wasn’t designed with power-efficiency in mind, and its power consumption is significantly higher than it could have been, had the developers really paid special attention to this aspect. One of the good examples could be the recently reviewed MSI E350IS-E45 mainboard, which power consumption in idle mode was only 7.3 W.

What a shame x-bit labs

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-22 21:12 發表
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... 0-g440_7.html#sect0



from previous article:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles ... 2100t_11.html#sect0


What a shame x-bit labs ...

Despite the fact E-350 does have the best energy control,
G440 isn't stills looks comparable.

7W vs 15W Idle.
(23-7)?W vs 21W Full Load

Idle consumption actually doesn't really need to be concerned, as the router will not stay claim for in most of the time as of a Desktop; there will always be loading.
Taking performance also in the consideration, do you think G440 worths a try?

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-22 21:33 編輯 ]