ccw

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-22 23:43 發表


佢唔信之嘛
x86 好抽得嫁  

I am always skeptical towards everything I am going to spend on;
I am not that rich such that I must take great care on every purchase.

jackli

最衰系我依家無玩1Gbps..
同埋都無friend 有la,

無得試比你睇xD

ccw

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-23 09:24 發表
最衰系我依家無玩1Gbps..
同埋都無friend 有la,

無得試比你睇xD

Thank you for your effort in all those explanation, it has been very valuable and details references
And if 94Mbps throughput takes only a few % of CPU utilization, it looks I don't need to worry for a ten times loading.

ccw

Shit, I can get >1 ip from HKBN BB1000 modem
X86 router postponed

jackli

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-23 23:04 發表
Shit, I can get >1 ip from HKBN BB1000 modem
X86 router postponed

好似有得最多拎兩個ip..

ccw

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-24 00:06 發表


好似有得最多拎兩個ip..

Trying to see if that is the case,
currently trying 3 connections,
Server, Notebook and router.
It looks the router cannot get the IP address, I have to check if that is a router's issue or IP No. limit.

ccw

Sadly the router cannot obtain any ip..........
And passing through the switch the maximum throughput drops to 600Mbits,
without the AP switch it can reach 900Mbits.

So router will still be constructed, soon or later.

jackli

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-24 00:56 發表
Sadly the router cannot obtain any ip..........
And passing through the switch the maximum throughput drops to 600Mbits,
without the AP switch it can reach 900Mbits.

So router will still be construct ...

真系最多得兩個咁準?

ccw

引用:

原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-24 06:32 發表


真系最多得兩個咁準?

Not confirmed but there maybe issue,
the computer must to turned on before turning on the switch;
if the computer is turned on after turning on the switch,
it may not be able to get the IP.

ccw

http://news.mydrivers.com/1/210/210183.htm

lctang

http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=1698539

ccw

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-11-24 15:00 發表
http://www.hkepc.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=1698539

Thank you, I did search something in No.1 but I may have missed this post.

And more, probably, I will now consider having G440+H61 as the solution...........
Old Atom boards suck, and new Atom is never gonna appear.
E-350 is good, but expensive and I don't feel like paying more on the graphical power that I never touch.
Rather than that, it looks better for me to pay on the processing power.

If I am to get a CPU on M.ITX board with PCI-E slot in HK for ~700, there aren't many options.
And probably I will fall back to M-ATX if possible and get a J&W D525, any idea for this brand?

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-24 17:09 編輯 ]

ccw

Something else?
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/209/209826.htm
Looks even a better choice for router

Updated:
但很可惜，它并不针对零售市场，只会预装在OEM小型服务器里，自然也就没有公开报价。

Sadly

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-11-24 22:44 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-24 22:43 發表
Something else?
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/209/209826.htm
Looks even a better choice for router

Updated:
但很可惜，它并不针对零售市场，只会预装在OEM小型服务器里，自然也就没有公开报价。

Sadly:cr ...

no way a SB-based CPU can beat Bonnell / Bobcat in power consumption alone

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-11-25 00:27 發表

no way a SB-based CPU can beat Bonnell / Bobcat in power consumption alone

Sure, but there is no need to be a winner, just make sure if the power consumption of the system is within a tolerable range;
doesn't stand a great difference from Bobcat and Atom.

As seen in the G440, E-350 and Atom comparison, the consumption of G440 doesn't set it too ugly as a router processor, and it was a 35W TDP unit.
Now this 15W TDP CPU does look very promising in number, though nothing can be told before a test have been carried out.