打印

[硬件] X86 router NAT performance w/ Atom board? The ANS is NO.

引用:
原帖由 ccw 於 2011-11-25 00:41 發表

Sure, but there is no need to be a winner, just make sure if the power consumption of the system is within a tolerable range;
doesn't stand a great difference from Bobcat and Atom.

As seen in the G4 ...
10W difference is huge enough

TOP

Thanks lc for switch suggestion,
I have just bought PCi FXG-08EP for $330, 900Mbits NAT,
and the Buffalo Router can get the IP.
Now:
Modem --> Cat6 --> Switch --> Server
                                        --> Router --> Other computers
                                                        --> My notebook
The above solution is very acceptable as a secondary option before there is suitable hardware for the X86 router.

Also thanks all other who have shared their valuable ideas and experience.

TOP

TOP

TOP

你試左未?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 jackli 於 2011-11-30 16:46 發表
你試左未?
I don't have any atom hardware,
and there aren't any suitable board within budget.

TOP

tried with any pc ?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 lctang 於 2011-11-30 18:59 發表
tried with any pc ?
Sorry, not yet, for me to have no spare PC to try....

TOP

deliberately crippled

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-1 00:00 發表

deliberately crippled
Otherwise with its built in 8574L and passive cooling + Mini PCI-E, this will be a perfect board for my router.......

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-1 00:09 發表

Otherwise with its built in 8574L and passive cooling + Mini PCI-E, this will be a perfect board for my router.......
intel deliberately cripples atom platform

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-12-1 00:10 發表

intel deliberately cripples atom platform
Not restricted to Atom.....

TOP

try ClearOS VM version....

TOP

引用:
原帖由 lctang 於 2011-12-1 00:26 發表
try ClearOS VM version....
It will be fine, but what I want to confirm is the capability of the proposed hardware.
Building the VM on server should be able to get it work, but hard to compare and estimate the real requirement on hardware.

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ccw 於 2011-12-1 00:43 發表

It will be fine, but what I want to confirm is the capability of the proposed hardware.
Building the VM on server should be able to get it work, but hard to compare and estimate the real requirement  ...
the VM version can estimate

TOP