GeN~XP

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-9-5 15:09 發表

50% increase is "NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE"

think he means... not much difference from Q9 series

bebird

引用:

原帖由 GeN~XP 於 2011-9-5 15:17 發表


think he means... not much difference from Q9 series

his meaning is E3400 > SNB Celeron, 50% faster?

GeN~XP

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2011-9-5 15:21 發表

his meaning is E3400 > SNB Celeron, 50% faster?

i think so...

Henry

引用:

原帖由 GeN~XP 於 2011-9-5 15:17 發表


think he means... not much difference from Q9 series

the rate from Q9 to SNB, or from E3200 to SNB-C should about the same

qcmadness

intel逼amd用3-core / 4-core打dual-core...

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2011-9-5 15:41 發表

the rate from Q9 to SNB, or from E3200 to SNB-C should about the same

no

賓尼._.

Celeron Sandy Bridge 整唔整K板呢
整就完全封殺

isar

celeron sandy bridge我似乎仲有興趣

刺青

引用:

原帖由 賓尼._. 於 5/9/2011 07:41 PM 發表
Celeron Sandy Bridge 整唔整K板呢
整就完全封殺

我估intel 唔會出黎打自己掛
有i5 i7 兩粒K 應該已經足夠

lctang

引用:

原帖由 刺青 於 2011-9-5 22:32 發表

我估intel 唔會出黎打自己掛
有i5 i7 兩粒K 應該已經足夠

但有人仍然覺得唔夠

賓尼._.

引用:

原帖由 刺青 於 2011-9-5 22:32 發表

我估intel 唔會出黎打自己掛
有i5 i7 兩粒K 應該已經足夠

2C2T
4C4T
4C8T
唔同啵

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 賓尼._. 於 2011-9-5 19:41 發表
Celeron Sandy Bridge 整唔整K板呢
整就完全封殺

APU都難超頻

Int. clock gen係大勢

lctang

引用:

原帖由 賓尼._. 於 2011-9-5 22:45 發表

2C2T
4C4T
4C8T
唔同啵

6C12T
8C16T

ccw

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2011-9-5 22:51 發表


6C12T
8C16T

I would like to have a 8C1T

lctang

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-9-5 22:54 發表

I would like to have a 8C1T

but x2