qcmadness

http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/viewthr ... page%3D1&page=1

http://www.laptoplogic.com/resources/detail.php?id=17&page=16

引用:

Intel computes thermal design power as 75% of the maximum load on the chip, while AMD\'s TDP rating is derived from the absolute worst case power dissipation of the chip. Part of the total system power is also incorporated into AMD\'s TDP, as the memory controller is located on-chip.

XT

唔明

trentcys

Since P-class Intel has been using different figures for TDP (ie, typical) and max load.
And AMD did the same at least for K6 and K7 series.

But I can\'t imagine why AMD would rate K8 at max power, didn\'t they want to make the chips look cooler?!

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by trentcys at 2005-12-1 16:21:
Since P-class Intel has been using different figures for TDP (ie, typical) and max load.
And AMD did the same at least for K6 and K7 series.

But I can\'t imagine why AMD would rate K8 at max pow ...

It would be better for the manufacturers to follow

Henry

Intel以前D CPU就跟時脈俾TDP值.
而家(Prescott打後)就跟Cooler俾TDP值.
所以而家TDP越細,Cooler越Cheap,未必代表CPU既發熱量細左.

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2005-12-1 19:19:
Intel以前D CPU就跟時脈俾TDP值.
而家(Prescott打後)就跟Cooler俾TDP值.
所以而家TDP越細,Cooler越Cheap,未必代表CPU既發熱量細左.

咁狗?

HEAVEN‧傑

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2005-12-1 19:19:
Intel以前D CPU就跟時脈俾TDP值.
而家(Prescott打後)就跟Cooler俾TDP值.
所以而家TDP越細,Cooler越Cheap,未必代表CPU既發熱量細左.

overheat之王

Totti

引用:

Originally posted by Henry at 2005-12-1 19:19:
Intel以前D CPU就跟時脈俾TDP值.
而家(Prescott打後)就跟Cooler俾TDP值.
所以而家TDP越細,Cooler越Cheap,未必代表CPU既發熱量細左.

人渣

HEAVEN‧傑

引用:

Originally posted by Totti at 2005-12-1 20:53:

人渣

話唔定低1 grade
電壓高0.3v

qcmadness

引用:

Originally posted by HEAVEN‧傑 at 2005-12-1 20:52:

overheat之王

小心減速