DICKXDV

由於CANON 食

細機得GF 系同E-LP系....唯有考慮佢地..

想問, 邊隻好?

睇左D 用家評語.....有D 唔明.

1. D 人話ELP1/2 係有防手震, GF 1 定2都係冇, 真的嗎?
   ELP 1/2 的所謂防手震, 係機械式, 定係係DC 界個隻電子式(好似係咩SET高ISO SET高D 咩數值扮出黎)

2. GF2 係用TOUCH MON, 係冇禁好?

3. ELP2 行好似4.9K, GF 系水都好似要5-6K 幾.
   行貨ELP 系..個代理OK唔OK?

4. 禁見D NEWS 話...M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II
   即係ZOOM 鏡?(唔係定鏡?)
  AND ELP 其他配件/鏡頭會唔會好貴?

5. 邊到有真機試?

THANKS

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-11 11:51 發表
由於CANON 食

細機得GF 系同E-LP系....唯有考慮佢地..

想問, 邊隻好?

睇左D 用家評語.....有D 唔明.

1. D 人話ELP1/2 係有防手震, GF 1 定2都係冇, � ...

1. E-PL1/2 has on device IS, while Panny's are on lens.
2. Not sure but the buttons are smaller and someone said the GF2 is less convenient in control.
3. No idea but it is Olympus itself who are responding for the warranty, it should be ok.
4. Zoom lens, and OM and Panny share the same lens.
5. No idea, sorry.

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 15:09 發表


1. E-PL1/2 has on device IS, while Panny's are on lens.
2. Not sure but the buttons are smaller and someone said the GF2 is less convenient in control.
3. No idea but it is Olympus itself who ...

即係防手震都係睇LENS?

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-11 15:13 發表


即係防手震都係睇LENS?

On OM machines, no matter what lens(M4/3) is attached IS will be available,
for Panny, IS only available on Panny's lens. OM's lens doesn't have IS.

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 18:20 發表

On OM machines, no matter what lens(M4/3) is attached IS will be available,
for Panny, IS only available on Panny's lens. OM's lens doesn't have IS.

SORRY, 請問咩野係PANNY?

我只係DC用家, 唔識DSLR的野/名字....THX

同埋,係唔係而家未有行貨PENPEL?

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-11 19:54 發表


SORRY, 請問咩野係PANNY?

我只係DC用家, 唔識DSLR的野/名字....THX

同埋,係唔係而家未有行貨PENPEL?

abbreviation of Panasonic

For penpal, I am not sure, you may confirm with OM by phoning them.

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 20:00 發表

abbreviation of Panasonic

For penpal, I am not sure, you may confirm with OM by phoning them.

呵....

但係同廠機只可用同廠LENS?

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-11 20:35 發表


呵....

但係同廠機只可用同廠LENS?

No, Panny can use OM's and vice versa.

Btw, to conclude,
the day light performance of GF2 and E-PL2 are quite similar with E-PL2 having a better JPEG output.
For dimmer light image quality, E-PL2 will be doing a better job.
In video taking, GF2 beat E-PL2 in miles,
Nex 5 is worse than the above in image details, but it has a better performance in taking high iso images.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 21:11 編輯 ]

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 21:09 發表

No, Panny can use OM's and vice versa.

Btw, to conclude,
the day light performance of GF2 and E-PL2 are quite similar with E-PL2 having a better JPEG output.
For dimmer light image quality, ...

'但拍片, E D 機唔係有時間限制的嗎? (因為過熱)

但我不需要了...DC仔可拍720P.......IPT4 可指720P(但好恐怖)

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-11 21:22 發表


'但拍片, E D 機唔係有時間限制的嗎? (因為過熱)

但我不需要了...DC仔可拍720P.......IPT4 可指720P(但好恐怖)

I don't know for GF2 but
don't expect much on E-PL2's, limited at 7 mins and quality is awful.

GF2 has a better engine and in AVCHD format, the quality is not bad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MuWma6ew4w&feature=related

(因為過熱)....this is not the main reason at least for M4/3 machines I know.
APSC does have this problem, say the Sony a55v.

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 22:30 編輯 ]

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 22:28 發表

I don't know for GF2 but
don't expect much on E-PL2's, limited at 7 mins and quality is awful.

GF2 has a better engine and in AVCHD format, the quality is not bad.
[url]http://www.youtube.c ...

如果拍片就用DV仲好啦

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-11 22:31 發表


如果拍片就用DV仲好啦

sure, but sometimes it will be great that your single device can have both of the jobs done, especially in travelling.
What I am trying to say is that,
you should consider your need for buying the cameras,
judging the image quality:
http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusepl2/page6.asp

and think if it is worthwhile to pay 1000 more for a better video function.
Personally I do prefer E-PL2, and it is now 4450 without any gift.
http://www.price.com.hk/product.php?p=123957

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2011-1-12 00:20 編輯 ]

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-11 23:03 發表

sure, but sometimes it will be great that your single device can have both of the jobs done, especially in travelling.
What I am trying to say is that,
you should consider your need for buying  ...

no gift = no sd card no screen protector no bag no 3rd party battery n....?

ccw

引用:

原帖由 DICKXDV 於 2011-1-12 07:48 發表


no gift = no sd card no screen protector no bag no 3rd party battery n....?

I thnk so, you'd better check with the shop....btw, I heard from someone in OMuser reported that buying in broadway with credit card will have a rebate up to $400(totally $4480) and there are quite a lot of gifts.

PS : After a few days of using E-PL2, I do think that the touch screen of GF2 will bring great convenience in choosing focusing target.

DICKXDV

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-1-12 08:57 發表

I thnk so, you'd better check with the shop....btw, I heard from someone in OMuser reported that buying in broadway with credit card will have a rebate up to $400(totally $4480) and there are qui ...

rebate?!