dom

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD ... cessor.74885.0.html

Cinebench R10 CPU
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52         2554
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335         2564.5
Intel Pentium U5400          2599
AMD A-Series A6-4455M          2601  

AMD Turion II Neo K625          2541  <----------
..........................我部 Turion II Neo K625 分分鐘差唔多快過佢

WTF
唔惦喎老細.........好慢

qcmadness

BD玩cinebench係特別慢

bebird

APU failed

符碌

我細佬已經等唔切,買左thinkpad e530了,行i5又有nv獨顯

poonyc

I5 殺晒~

MacMonster

同舊U差唔多.

qcmadness

Group 1: Llano > Trinity ~ SB i3



Group 2: Trinity > Llano > SB i3




Group 3: SB i3 > Trinity > Llano





It all depends on workload

dom

問題係 Notebook 無 3.0GHz+ .........

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2012-8-23 01:11 發表
問題係 Notebook 無 3.0GHz+ .........

Llano best mobile CPU:
A8-3550MX: 2.0GHz / 2.7GHz, 45W, 5 SIMD shader group

Trinity best mobile CPU:
A10-4600M: 2.3GHz / 3.2GHz, 35W, 6 SIMD shader group

Note the difference?

Puff

你粒 15W Turion II 無 IGP 唔洗計 GPU power 架嘛... 如果飛甩 IGP，空出黎既 power budget 用黎谷頻率咪可以高分 D，trade-off 姐。

[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2012-8-23 04:16 編輯 ]

符碌

Trinity都好唔掂下喎

qcmadness

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a10-5800k-a8-5600k-a6-5400k,3224-21.html

引用:

Let’s start with the Piledriver architecture, which everyone is hoping will show up in a desktop-class CPU sooner than later. Our per-clock cycle testing suggests that the revised design, as it’s implemented on Trinity, is as much as 15% faster than Bulldozer. A quad-core Trinity-based chip will still trail a quad-core Llano APU if you hit it with a floating-point-heavy workload—but that’s to be expected, given that each of two Piledriver modules shares a floating-point unit. Fortunately for AMD, most of what we use to test taxes the architecture’s four integer cores.

A majority of our benchmarks favor Trinity over Llano thanks to IPC improvements and significantly higher clock rates. Piledriver still gives up significant instruction per cycle throughput compared to the older Stars design, but is better able to compensate than Bulldozer. The result, then, is modest x86 performance. It’s better than Bulldozer, but only a slight step up from what you get Llano. And that’s if we ignore the competition entirely. I didn’t have a appropriately-priced Intel chip to test, but just received a Core i3-2100 from Newegg that comes close to matching an A8-3870K’s price tag. Tests commence on that tonight.

dom

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2012/8/23 04:13 發表
你粒 15W Turion II 無 IGP 唔洗計 GPU power 架嘛... 如果飛甩 IGP，空出黎既 power budget 用黎谷頻率咪可以高分 D，trade-off 姐。

問題係 A 記要識 Sell APU 先得架