dom

都話左 AMD Faildozer 唔係真8核囉
性能同架構上都唔係原生八核
咪又係 4Module = (Quad CORE) w/ eight Thread

講極都係話 FX 八核
八你個死人頭


FX-8xxx = Quad Core w/8 Thread = Core i5 - Core i7 (NOT LGA2011 Core i7)
FX-6xxx = Tri-Core w/6 Thread = Core i5
FX-4xxx = Dual CORE w/4 thread = Core i3

THERE IS NO 8Core , NO BLOODY 8CORE!

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2013-1-8 02:25 編輯 ]

Henry

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 02:21 發表
都話左 AMD Faildozer 唔係真8核囉
性能同架構上都唔係原生八核
咪又係 4Module = (Quad CORE) w/ eight Thread

講極都係話 FX 八核
八你個死人頭 :nono ...

遲D Intel就真八核。

dom

引用:

原帖由 Henry 於 2013/1/8 02:40 發表

遲D Intel就真八核。

到時個腦殘 8Core

jackli

Xeon e5-2650

jackli

好想擁有部 dual xeon 16core, 32thread...
但系擁有過 dual p3 的我應該仲未捨得買

pk1667

FX-8xxx = Quad Core w/8 Thread  <- 我都以為係真 8CORE

qcmadness

You are wrong

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/8 12:37 發表
You are wrong

Faildozer still Epic Fail, just fail less with Poop()driver

smallhonhon

有齊ALU，FPU， L1， L2， L3 獨立行一THREAD 都唔計一CORE？

smallhonhon

哦～我明你想講咩 XD

smallhonhon

我成日都覺得將多CORE都唔係重點，係PERFORMANCE 有幾快

dom

引用:

原帖由 smallhonhon 於 2013/1/8 16:20 發表
我成日都覺得將多CORE都唔係重點，係PERFORMANCE 有幾快

The problem is It doesnt perform !
Just like GCN Vs Kepler

GCN spec look good on paper, but in reality it need "cheat" driver to cheat performance

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2013-1-8 17:33 編輯 ]

kevinyuri

44聲意頭唔好，88聲好聽d XD

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 17:31 發表


The problem is It doesnt perform !
Just like GCN Vs Kepler

GCN spec look good on paper, but in reality it need "cheat" driver to cheat performance

BS

以你講法, Atom D525唔係dual-core啦

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/8 19:23 發表

BS

以你講法, Atom D525唔係dual-core啦