dom

http://www.anandtech.com/show/76 ... w-a8-7600-a10-7850k

引用:

With Llano and Trinity AMD would try to mask CPU performance difficiencies by blaming benchmarks or claiming that heterogeneous computing was just around the corner. While it still believes in the latter, AMD's Kaveri presentations didn't attempt to force the issue and instead focused heavily on gaming as the killer app for its latest APU. HSA and heterogeneous computing are still important, but today AMD hopes to sell Kaveri largely based on its ability to deliver 1080p gaming in modern titles at 30 fps. Our testing looks favourably on this claim with some titles getting big boosts over similar powered Richland counterparts, although the devil is in the details.  

要打機 加卡好過啦


不過
45W TDP A8-7600 , Quad Core,  ITX 應該幾arm

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2014-1-15 00:08 編輯 ]

dom

For QC
http://www.anandtech.com/show/76 ... a8-7600-a10-7850k/4

dellasus

最抵買就係個兩粒7600

Puff

得 45W 見得人

bebird

i3-3240 vs A8-7600
Which one is better?

bebird

just finished reading the review, seems A8-7600 is a better balance (CPU + GPU) than haswell i3, some slower in CPU, but quite faster GPU, 45W comparing with 54W i3

but FM2+, less upgrade path than Intel.

A8-7600 45W / 65W is a good CPU now for thin ITX casual gaming or HTPC computer.

see whether HK can buy

lctang

引用:

原帖由 bebird 於 2014-1-15 10:32 發表
just finished reading the review, seems A8-7600 is a better balance (CPU + GPU) than haswell i3, some slower in CPU, but quite faster GPU, 45W comparing with 54W i3

but FM2+, less upgrade path than I ...

但個 ICH

dom

引用:

原帖由 lctang 於 2014/1/16 12:45 發表


但個 ICH

Really
Have you try FCH before?

Aware

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2014-1-16 19:31 發表


Really
Have you try FCH before?

A7X/8X put SB to rubbish bin.
Total different perfornance

bebird

however, it still uses a lot power than i3
76w (A8 65w version) vs 43w (i3)

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/a10-7850k-a8-7600-kaveri,3725-15.html

[ 本帖最後由 bebird 於 2014-1-17 18:50 編輯 ]