引用:
原帖由 siuba 於 2013-3-28 02:15 發表
Intel同人講Phil優於NV/AMD原因係x86..就係咁簡單..existing既轉移可以比起其他花更少時間..
唔好唔記得intel本身係有粒larrabee在先..
You still need to rework your code on Phi in fact (128-bit to 512-bit vector, and Phi has no support of SSE) and it still takes you time to optimize as on GPUs. The real advantages of Phi are its higher serial performance per core, and its large coherent cache. These enable Phi to cover algorithms that GPU may not familiar with. On the other hand, these become power and performance disadvantages relative to GPUs in traditional throughput workloads, for instance, rasterization-based rendering pipeline.
By the way, there are developers complaining about Phi's current development tools, which make heavy use of pragmas.
[
本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-3-28 17:52 編輯 ]