dom

4GHz Club
Easy job for Intel , just enter " 200 x20 " ........
AMD work hard please

Tommi_Vercetti

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2010-1-25 23:59:
4GHz Club
Easy job for Intel , just enter " 200 x20 " ........
AMD work hard please

actually Clark-bar\'s simple 2 hit 4.8Ghz or higher if changin to other heatsink.
1, Clark-bar的特性和肥2差不多，越餵大V-Core電它越有，基本上唔怕縮
2, VTT keep住1.33-1.38V已ok
3, 行2:6超可接受，不過好多廠都執緊Clark-bar的2:8 / 2:10超唔起問題

4, 你粒U肯定還可上

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2010-1-26 at 00:10 ]

dom

Updated
收到路邊社 話 Phenom II x2 555BE 今個月內到少量貨
Phenom II x2 555BE VS Pentium DualCore G6950 應該幾有趣

dom

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2010-1-26 00:07:


actually Clark-bar\'s simple 2 hit 4.8Ghz or higher if changin to other heatsink.
1, Clark-bar的特性和肥2差不多，越餵大V-Core電它越有，基本上唔怕縮
2, VTT keep住1.33-1.38V已ok
3, 行2:6超 ...

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/ph ... review-31794-4.html

引用:

How Not To Overclock A Clarkdale
There\'s good news and bad news tied to our overclocking endeavors, as can often be the case when you push hardware harder than it\'s supposed to go. First, the good news: we achieved a substantial overclock of 4.5 GHz on our retail Pentium G6950 CPU in preparation for this story. We throttled it back to 4.41 GHz to keep the temperatures in check for our benchmarking runs, yielding an impressive 1.61 GHz over the stock frequency.

Now for the bad news: it doesn\'t count. We killed the processor. Bolstered by reasonable temperature reading and a bit of overconfidence, I pushed the Pentium too hard. My choice of voltage was likely the murder weapon: I set it to 1.475V. In my defense, these are still very new chips, and this is the first G6950 in our lab. There were no warning signs and the CPU lasted through a couple hours of Prime95 testing. Halfway through the overclocked benchmarking runs, the CPU simply died.
Not while stress testing Prime95, mind you, but during the AVG virus scan benchmark. Therefore, there will be a follow-up to this article in the next couple of weeks when our replacement arrives. I will be going a second round with the G6950, and this time I\'ll be limiting myself to a maximum 1.4 V. I will also be testing the CPU on a budget Intel board in the same price range as the Asus M4A785TD-V EVO we used to test the Phenom II X2 555.

Intel 繼續 重電好易死

[ Last edited by dom on 2010-1-26 at 01:09 ]

dom

好在我行安全 ,  1.35V MAX

Tommi_Vercetti

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2010-1-26 00:31:


http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/ph ... review-31794-4.html


Intel 繼續 重電好易死

[ Last edited by dom on 2010-1-26 at 01:09 ]

ES的確容易電死，但Retail情況據知好好多
和我覺得TOMS那邊應該有電壓打過火了…

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2010-1-26 at 01:38 ]

dom

引用:

Originally posted by Tommi_Vercetti at 2010-1-26 01:34:


ES的確容易電死，但Retail情況據知好好多
和我覺得TOMS那邊應該有電壓打過火了…

[ Last edited by Tommi_Vercetti on 2010-1-26 at 01:38 ]

我見 Intel 45nm 已經有高電會縮既情況 , 所以 Intel U 唔會大電.......
AMD 既我自己玩到盡都係 1.55V MAX

Tommi_Vercetti

引用:

Originally posted by dom at 2010-1-26 22:26:


我見 Intel 45nm 已經有高電會縮既情況 , 所以 Intel U 唔會大電.......
AMD 既我自己玩到盡都係 1.55V MAX

Intel的話，其實由E8開始已提及VTT過1.4V好易死，反而VCore加過1.5V還可接受…