dom

引用:

原帖由 Aware 於 2011/8/17 12:54 發表

Intel正常。
USB3都冇啦。

出完 X79 , 整個 X80 比你 "Unlock ,Light Peak , SATA III x10 "

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2011-8-17 14:08 發表
出完 X79 , 整個 X80 比你 "Unlock ,Light Peak , SATA III x10 "

以前就話Intel用Promise, AMD用Silicon Image

而家睇來2間都係自己develop... 因為好似差咁遠...

dom

AMD 個 RAIDXpert 應該係 Promise 出品

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-17 14:08 發表

for better stability, you should go for 510 instead...

Really?
The warranty of 510 is shorter than 320, 5 years and 3 years,
I don't know if this is related implying the confidence of Intel to its SSDs durability.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 14:16 發表

Really?
The warranty of 510 is shorter than 320, 5 years and 3 years,
I don't know if this is related implying the confidence of Intel to its SSDs durability.

of course...

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-17 14:18 發表

of course...

Though 510 is designed for server use, personally I pay more trust on Intel's own controller, at least it is proven in G2.
Maybe the question will fall on the 25nm NAND, their durability is open to question and issues were observed when first applied in OCZ V2.

At the moment it is still hard to say which one is more stable to go; as observed in forums, although 510 was rated by Intel as a server disk, a majority would suggest 320 for higher reliability(claims on different ground).
While being backed by a 5 years warranty, I am not worrying about the durability in my 320.

Henry

引用:

原帖由 ccw 於 2011-8-17 09:37 發表
经过一番折腾之后，用于搭配LGA2011 Sandy Bridge-E处理器的X79芯片组还是没能达到最初的预计水平，SATA磁盘接口只会有十个。

X79芯片组面向桌面，只有这一个版本，而对应的服务器平台则有四款不同规格的芯片组Patsburg-T/D ...

SCU = ??
Extra chip? or.....though I don't think so.

SSD, I think avoiding Intel and SF, you only have Micron.
Toshiba and Samsung, not so easy to get in HK in my mind.

ccw

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2011-8-17 13:47 發表

http://www.hkepc.com/6751

同埋SF-2281真係太快
出左之後, 真係少左好多人出Intel SSD

FYI,
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/202/202014.htm