qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 19:43 發表

仲以為你有進步, 原來係

刺青

http://www.amd.com/us/products/d ... fx/Pages/amdfx.aspx

native 8-core ?

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/8 19:44 發表

仲以為你有進步, 原來係

- 只能和 Core i5 上代同級 憑咩叫 8Core
- 一 Heavy Load 就疾機 咁叫 Mega Multi-thread 嗎 ?

62561

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-1-8 19:23 發表

BS

以你講法, Atom D525唔係dual-core啦

Atom330同Atom D525我都有用,其實行XP好夠用,就算行Win8都唔慢,但唔好裝Vista.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 22:01 發表


- 只能和 Core i5 上代同級 憑咩叫 8Core
- 一 Heavy Load 就疾機 咁叫 Mega Multi-thread 嗎 ?

Atom D525慢過Celeron 440, 憑咩叫dual-core, 又會疾機, 咁叫multi-thread咩?

你個理論全錯

效能同幾多個core無必然關係

pk1667

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013-1-9 03:52 發表

效能同幾多個core無必然關係

呢樣我認同

dom

How about Phenom II x6 1045T vs FX-6300
same hexa core, why near 100% cpu load situation , FX-6300 lag more and less responsive compare with Phenom II x6 ?

Puff

Whether it is dual-core is not decided by its relative performance level to its predecessor, but whether it has a monolithic dual-core performance in certain workloads is. No matter how someone says, a Bulldozer module does not fit the definition of SMT, at least from the core pipeline perspective.

There is no certain definition for "core", but there is one for SMT. So Orochi being quad-core, eight-thread fails this way. But does it really perform as a eight-core? It depends on implementation and workloads then, and undoubtedly Bulldozer doesn't have a catchy single-thread performance to facilitate its niche multi-core scaling.

[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-1-9 16:42 編輯 ]

Puff

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-8 17:31 發表


The problem is It doesnt perform !
Just like GCN Vs Kepler

GCN spec look good on paper, but in reality it need "cheat" driver to cheat performance

Simply because you just keep your eyes on the marketing figures, but not digging deep enough. Tahiti's fixed function does not have the level of GK104's. This is the fact. So cheat? No. It performs how it should be.

And it has the compute capability as AMD claimed. AMD does not give guidance on SI's graphics performance before launch either, only the benefits to compute.

[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2013-1-9 16:03 編輯 ]

dom

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2013/1/9 15:53 發表

Simply because you just keep your eyes on the marketing figures, but not digging deep enough. Tahiti's fixed function does not have the level of GK104's. This is the fact. So cheat? No. It performs h ...

It does not perform normally with DX9 title, where the F___ the backward compatibility?

dom

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2013/1/9 15:49 發表
Whether it is dual-core is not decided by its relative performance level to its predecessor, but whether it has a monolithic dual-core performance in certain workloads is. No matter how someone says,  ...

Well thats why its call FAILDOZER

dom

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2013/1/9 15:49 發表
Whether it is dual-core is not decided by its relative performance level to its predecessor, but whether it has a monolithic dual-core performance in certain workloads is. No matter how someone says,  ...

Well thats why its call FAILDOZER

Puff

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-9 17:07 發表


Well thats why its call FAILDOZER

And there are eight Faildozer cores.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2013-1-9 09:41 發表
How about Phenom II x6 1045T vs FX-6300
same hexa core, why near 100% cpu load situation , FX-6300 lag more and less responsive compare with Phenom II x6 ?

你只需要答我
Atom D525慢過Celeron 440, 咁佢係dual-core定single-core

dom

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2013/1/9 20:40 發表

你只需要答我
Atom D525慢過Celeron 440, 咁佢係dual-core定single-core

It's still a Dual