打印

[硬件] APU VS Athlon II Vs Epic Faildozer Vs Phenom II

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2012-4-5 01:11 發表

Are you talking about cores? This is an issue of how AMD is telling Microsoft to profile its Bulldozer for desktop applications. And the flaw is not about the front-end at all, as one core is still e ...
for certain there is something wrong in front-end

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2012/4/5 01:11 發表

Are you talking about cores? This is an issue of how AMD is telling Microsoft to profile its Bulldozer for desktop applications. And the flaw is not about the front-end at all, as one core is still e ...
You can see HyperPI result clearly affected ...
Even Disable / Enable Module , when excuse CPU intensive task together ,
FX-4100 have a hard time to allocate its Hardware resources .....

Phenom II / Athlon II don;'t have such issue

EDIT : This issue affect all tested CPU

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2012-4-5 21:43 編輯 ]
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 dom 於 2012-4-4 18:37 發表


Sorry , end user (Desktop) 90% use Windows
Windows Driver 問題
推土機起設計上 , 佢更似一粒 CMT 既 CPU 多過 SMT

TOP

FUN part begins tonight

Phenom II X6 1045T 正式參戰 (Disable 2 Core as Phenom II X4)

[ 本帖最後由 dom 於 2012-4-5 21:33 編輯 ]
附件: 您所在的用戶組無法下載或查看附件
天然系長髮眼鏡娘 最高
Lucky Star 聯盟 - 美幸
Kancolle - 大淀, 翔鶴 (太太), 烏海 , 瑞鶴

TOP

引用:
原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-4-5 01:49 發表

for certain there is something wrong in front-end
I only know that there is some limitation related to AVX-256. Is there anything else?

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Puff 於 2012-4-5 22:46 發表

I only know that there is some limitation related to AVX-256. Is there anything else?
possible location of problem
1. pre-fetch
2. l1 cache
3. decoder

TOP