dom

http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/09/amd-z60-tablet-chip/
AMD , Is that serious ?!?!?!

5W TDP for a Tablet , they are crazy

Puff

That's TDP. I think currently no vendor publishes the TDP of their tablet processors. Its 4.5W TDP figure is not only for the APU and FCH themselves. So if you trust and compare Intel's figures to AMD's, the AMD solution seems competitive in power consumption, without only always-connected standby.

And AMD-driven solutions come with AMD AppZone by default!

[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2012-10-10 20:53 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2012-10-10 20:48 發表
That's TDP. I think currently no vendor publishes the TDP of their tablet processors. Its 4.5W TDP figure is not only for the APU and FCH themselves. So if you trust and compare Intel's figures to AMD ...

Entirely untrue

http://ark.intel.com/products/55 ... 512K-Cache-1_50-GHz
3W

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-10-11 00:37 發表

Entirely untrue

http://ark.intel.com/products/55 ... 512K-Cache-1_50-GHz
3W

Entirely? Could you please find the TDP figure of the 32nm dual-core Cloverview for me then?
http://ark.intel.com/products/70105/Intel-Atom-Processor-Z2760-1MB-Cache-1_80-GHz

[ 本帖最後由 Puff 於 2012-10-11 18:25 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2012-10-11 18:23 發表

Entirely? Could you please find the TDP figure of the 32nm dual-core Cloverview for me then?
http://ark.intel.com/products/70 ... -1MB-Cache-1_80-GHz

Sub-2W

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-10-11 19:10 發表

Sub-2W

perhaps any sauce?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Puff 於 2012-10-11 20:23 發表

perhaps any sauce?

http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09 ... -windows-8-tablets/

引用:

Intel has rated the processor with a 1.7W TDP.

http://techreport.com/news/23646 ... il-based-atom-z2760

引用:

Despite boasting dual cores, Clover Trail has a TDP of less than 2W.

Puff

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2012-10-11 20:27 發表

http://ultrabooknews.com/2012/09 ... -windows-8-tablets/


http://techreport.com/news/23646 ... il-based-atom-z2760
...

My fault then. But it doesn't affect the statement afterwards.