qcmadness

dom

你係咪想我買 Shamesung 850 EVO

XT

引用:

原帖由 dom 於 2016-3-23 13:48 發表
你係咪想我買 Shamesung 850 EVO

走啦，你去買 adata 算啦

kevinyuri

其實850evo 個堆V-Nand TLC會唔會好過其他同價位TLC ssd? 480/512GB計
見腦場仲有隻kingston v3 MLC 480GB又係一千蚊到,買V3定係買TLC好?

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 kevinyuri 於 2016-3-23 16:25 發表
其實850evo 個堆V-Nand TLC會唔會好過其他同價位TLC ssd? 480/512GB計
見腦場仲有隻kingston v3 MLC 480GB又係一千蚊到,買V3定係買TLC好?

普通級MLC都唔夠打

Sandbo

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2016-3-23 21:01 發表

普通級MLC都唔夠打

Maybe some of them, but in fact TLC always suffers from some problems just because they are TLC.
At a similar price, I won't consider 850 EVO, where MX200 is available.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2 ... dont-advertise.html

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Sandbo 於 2016-3-23 22:06 發表

Maybe some of them, but in fact TLC always suffers from some problems just because they are TLC.
At a similar price, I won't consider 850 EVO, where MX200 is available.
http://www.pcworld.com/article ...

MX200 250GB / 500GB: HK$720 / HK$1390
850 EVO 250GB / 500GB: HK$640 / HK$1135

The price difference is not small.

Sandbo

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2016-3-23 22:08 發表

MX200 250GB / 500GB: HK$720 / HK$1390
850 EVO 250GB / 500GB: HK$640 / HK$1135

The price difference is not small.

You are right, but personally I found SSD to be another long lasting components (something you keep migrating to new computer);
it is OK to spend just 10% more on a MLC based SSD for a better guarantee, if you planned to use it for 5 years.

850 EVO is perfectly fine and I was considering buying it yesterday (where I then picked MX200 again),
I didn't find it convincing to not spend the extra 10% to get MLC at the moment.

Actually to be more accurate:
https://www.amazon.ca/Samsung-2- ... mp;keywords=850+evo
https://www.amazon.ca/Crucial-MX ... &keywords=mx200

http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-2- ... mp;keywords=850+evo
http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-MX ... &keywords=mx200

It is just HKs seller marking it up.

[ 本帖最後由 Sandbo 於 2016-3-23 22:17 編輯 ]

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Sandbo 於 2016-3-23 22:15 發表

You are right, but personally I found SSD to be another long lasting components (something you keep migrating to new computer);
it is OK to spend just 10% more on a MLC based SSD for a better guarant ...

Due to wearing, I would not expect SSD to last for 5 years.

I bought a Vertex 2 for my wife in 2012 and it wad dead last year.

Sandbo

引用:

原帖由 qcmadness 於 2016-3-23 22:31 發表

Due to wearing, I would not expect SSD to last for 5 years.

I bought a Vertex 2 for my wife in 2012 and it wad dead last year.

It depends,
I have a Vertex 2 64GB which I bought in 2010, used it on Laptop, then as a cache drive on workstation, then as the main drive on another computer,
it is still working perfectly well today.
Another Intel 160GB, I bought it in 2011, 24/7 for a year, then I used it as a system drive on another PC, followed by using it as a storage drive on my current PC which I BT onto it,
still alive.

My experience with SSD so far is much better than with harddisks, which many have failed after 3 years.

qcmadness

引用:

原帖由 Sandbo 於 2016-3-23 22:37 發表

It depends,
I have a Vertex 2 64GB which I bought in 2010, used it on Laptop, then as a cache drive on workstation, then as the main drive on another computer,
it is still working perfectly well toda ...

Anyway, I will go for raid 1 hdd backup