ivan15

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-11 12:43:
tested @ ISO 100
@F1.8 PQ差到無朋友

[ Last edited by cracker on 2010-4-11 at 12:45 ]

如果一支$6XX 鏡全開光圈勁SHARP 的話~
咁冇人要花多幾倍價錢買大半級光圈的鏡頭了~

ivan15

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-11 22:09:


光圈全開當然唔會sharp，呢支鏡好似起碼要收細兩三級先開始sharp d。

其實F/2.8 打後已經開始可以接受
"可以接受" 是指拍得住一般變焦鏡的質素

如果要勁SHARP, 的確要去到F/4左右~

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by ivan15 at 2010-4-11 23:59:


如果一支$6XX 鏡全開光圈勁SHARP 的話~
咁冇人要花多幾倍價錢買大半級光圈的鏡頭了~

有人會奢望有奇蹟出現

cracker

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 00:14:


有人會奢望有奇蹟出現

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 13:50:

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

你有冇L鏡/紅圈白鏡？

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 13:50:

玩過Canon L鏡或者Nikon概金圈鏡概人就唔會有呢個想法

死啦.. 我玩緊紅圈, 又有呢支50.8 都唔覺得呢支好得
叫做對得住6百零蚊既價錢啦

孔明

呢支鏡冇F4 都唔叫得做靚

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by 孔明 at 2010-4-12 16:46:
呢支鏡冇F4 都唔叫得做靚

F4？ 言承旭、周......？


買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

cracker

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 14:07:


你有冇L鏡/紅圈白鏡？

70-200 4L IS

cracker

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 17:26:


F4？ 言承旭、周......？


買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

師兄, 七舊水貨式算係貢上下

shitty

下我用果陣好似收到F2.8都OK呀(但我唔知係一代定二代)

河本鬼茂

引用:

Originally posted by cracker at 2010-4-12 17:40:

師兄, 七舊水貨式算係貢上下

d人話呢支鏡越賣越貴，前年$580，上年$680，今年$780喎....

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 17:26:


F4？ 言承旭、周......？


買F1.8，結果要收到F4，真係有d過份。

F4 算係咁上下啦...
2.8 係堪用, F3.5 係可用 , F4 係好用
坦白講 , 呢支定焦成像開到F4 其實可以拍得住Zoom 既L 鏡

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by 河本鬼茂 at 2010-4-12 18:11:


d人話呢支鏡越賣越貴，前年$580，上年$680，今年$780喎....

幾錢唔緊要
最重要都係個句 : F8 無廢鏡

孔明

引用:

Originally posted by shitty at 2010-4-12 17:40:
下我用果陣好似收到F2.8都OK呀(但我唔知係一代定二代)

咁你一定要收到F4 再試下