打印

[網絡] 乜Wireless Router 用係FTTH 200M好?

乜Wireless Router 用係FTTH 200M好?

而家用緊既ASUS RT-N16(DDWRT)好似食唔盡,試極都係得果130M

TOP

洗唔洗冇人理呀:o)

TOP

Wireless會用資源

TOP

i only know definitely not 1043nd

TOP

用緊BUFFALO WZR-HP-G300NH2好似都係130M咁上下

TOP

N16 有咩third-party firmware 食到200M ?
Hi~

TOP

青都係用N16?

TOP

TOP

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ccw 於 2012-7-4 08:37 發表
The inconvenient fact is no wireless router can utilize 200Mbps:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/l ... /94-2_4-ghz-updn-40
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/bar/96-5 ...
I don't care with wireless speed, but I care the speed with LAN cable.
The above speed is tested with Intel GBit LAN card.

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Aware 於 2012-7-4 17:22 發表

I don't care with wireless speed, but I care the speed with LAN cable.
The above speed is tested with Intel GBit LAN card.
Similarly, you may refer to the list of smallnetbuilder.......
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/view

and for sure I will, once again, suggest you build a x86 router

[ 本帖最後由 ccw 於 2012-7-4 17:41 編輯 ]

TOP

Also, this router maybe an option:
http://discuz.servehttp.com/view ... mp;page=2#pid980399

.......but you may want to get a RT-N56 for this price.

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ccw 於 2012-7-4 17:40 發表

Similarly, you may refer to the list of smallnetbuilder.......
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/lanwan/router-charts/view

and for sure I will, once again, suggest you build a x86 router
no space and $ for electricity bill
My main PC is eating enough money already

TOP

引用:
原帖由 ccw 於 2012-7-4 17:43 發表
Also, this router maybe an option:
http://discuz.servehttp.com/view ... mp;page=2#pid980399

.......but you may want to get a RT-N56 for this price.
for those support more than 200Mbps, which one support 3rd party firmware?
(ASUS firmware is suck and even no basic PPTP VPN support)

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Aware 於 2012-7-4 18:04 發表

for those support more than 200Mbps, which one support 3rd party firmware?
(ASUS firmware is suck and even no basic PPTP VPN support)
Sorry but I am not sure with this........after moving to x86@pfsense I seldom read their details

TOP